Parents’ consent must for children’s social media accounts:Centre

North News

New Delhi, January 4

The Centre government  has unveiled draft rules requiring children under 18 to obtain parental consent to open social media accounts, as part of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) released the proposed guidelines on Friday, inviting public feedback until 18 February 2025 via the MyGov.in platform.

The rules aim to strengthen privacy protections for minors by mandating “verifiable consent” from parents before processing their personal data. Data fiduciaries—organizations handling user data—will need to implement systems to confirm the identity and age of consenting adults.

For instance, parents may need to provide government-issued identity details or use a virtual token issued by authorized entities. Digital Locker services will play a key role in verifying such information, ensuring compliance with the law.

Detailed scenarios outlined in the draft emphasize how platforms should validate parental consent. In one case, if a parent is not registered on a platform, they must provide identity and age details issued by government-authorized bodies. In another, registered users must already have reliable information verified by the platform.

The draft rules also include provisions for individuals with disabilities, requiring data handlers to ensure the lawful guardian’s consent is verified through court-appointed or government-authorized entities.

The Ministry said that verifiable consent for processing of personal data of child or of person with disability who has lawful guardian.—(1) A Data Fiduciary shall adopt appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure that verifiable consent of the parent is obtained before the processing of any personal data of a child and shall observe due diligence, for checking that the individual identifying herself as the parent is an adult who is identifiable if required in connection with compliance with any law for the time being in force in India, by reference to— (a) reliable details of identity and age available with the Data Fiduciary; or (b) voluntarily provided details of identity and age or a virtual token mapped to the same, which is issued by an entity entrusted by law or the Central Government or a State Government with the maintenance of such details or a person appointed or permitted by such entity for such issuance, and includes such details or token verified and made available by a Digital Locker service provider.

Highlighting examples, the Ministry said that suppose  C is a child, P is her parent, and DF is a Data Fiduciary. A user account of C is sought to be created on the online platform of DF, by processing the personal data of C.

 Case 1: C informs DF that she is a child. DF shall enable C’s parent to identify herself through its website, app or other appropriate means. P identifies herself as the parent and informs DF that she is a registered user on DF’s platform and has previously made available her identity and age details to DF. Before processing C’s personal data for the creation of her user account, DF shall check to confirm that it holds reliable identity and age details of P.

Case 2: C informs DF that she is a child. DF shall enable C’s parent to identify herself through its website, app or other appropriate means. P identifies herself as the parent and informs DF that she herself is not a registered user on DF’s platform. Before processing C’s personal data for the creation of her user account, DF shall, by reference to identity and age details issued by an entity entrusted by law or the Government with maintenance of the said details or to a virtual token mapped to the same, check that P is an identifiable adult. P may voluntarily make such details available using the services of a Digital Locker service provider

Case 3: P identifies herself as C’s parent and informs DF that she is a registered user on DF’s platform and has previously made available her identity and age details to DF. Before processing C’s personal data for the creation of her user account, DF shall check to confirm that it holds reliable identity and age details of P.

Case 4: P identifies herself as C’s parent and informs DF that she herself is not a registered user on DF’s platform. Before processing C’s personal data for the creation of her user account, DF shall, by reference to identity and age details issued by an entity entrusted by law or the Government with maintenance of the said details or to a virtual token mapped to the same, check that P is an identifiable adult. P may voluntarily make such details available using the services of a Digital Locker service provider.

(2) A Data Fiduciary, while obtaining verifiable consent from an individual identifying herself as the lawful guardian of a person with disability, shall observe due diligence to verify that such guardian is appointed by a court of law, a designated authority or a local level committee, under the law applicable to guardianship. (3) In this rule, the expression— (a) “adult” shall mean an individual who has completed the age of eighteen years; (b) “Digital Locker service provider” shall mean such intermediary, including a body corporate or an agency of the appropriate Government, as may be notified by the Central Government, in accordance with the rules made in this regard under the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000); (c) “designated authority” shall mean an authority designated under section 15 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (49 of 2016) to support persons with disabilities in exercise of their legal capacity; (d) “law applicable to guardianship” shall mean,— (i) in relation to an individual who has long term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairment which, in interaction with barriers, hinders her full and effective participation in society equally with others and who despite being provided adequate and appropriate support is unable to take legally binding decisions, the provisions of law contained in Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (49 of 2016) and the rules made thereunder; and (ii) in relation to a person who is suffering from any of the conditions relating to autism, cerebral palsy, mental retardation or a combination of such conditions and includes a person suffering from severe multiple disability, the provisions of law of the National Trust for the Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999 (44 of 1999). and the rules made the  the reunder;

 (e) “local level committee” shall mean a local level committee constituted under section 13 of the National Trust for the Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999 (44 of 1999); (f) “person with disability” shall mean and include— (i) an individual who has long term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairment which, in interaction with barriers, hinders her full and effective participation in society equally with others and who, despite being provided adequate and appropriate support, is unable to take legally binding decisions; and (ii) an individual who is suffering from any of the conditions relating to autism, cerebral palsy, mental retardation or a combination of any two or more of such conditions and includes an individual suffering from severe multiple disability.