NORTH NEWS
NEW DELHI, OCTOBER 23
The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that the central government lacks the regulatory power over the production of industrial alcohol, affirming that states retain the authority to legislate on the matter. The judgment came from a Constitution Bench, with eight out of nine judges backing the interpretation that states hold jurisdiction over industrial alcohol.
The Court clarified that while alcoholic liquor and intoxicating liquor are both used for consumption, their legal treatment differs. It explained that “alcoholic liquor” is defined by its ingredients, whereas “intoxicating liquor” is defined by its effects. As a result, any alcoholic substance that can cause intoxication falls under the category of intoxicating liquor, extending to its manufacturing.
The bench emphasised the broader implications of the ruling for public health, stating that the term ‘intoxicating liquor’ must be interpreted to include any alcohol with the potential to harm health, not just those intended for consumption. This ruling reinforces the states’ authority in regulating alcohol production, a key area of contention between state and central powers. The decision also highlights the importance of public interest in the regulation of intoxicating substances.
